|Wed Feb 25 2009 6:37PM | MsgID: 10943791|
On one hand, Earl, etiquette and good manners pay no attention to time, be it past, present or future. Neither to whom is addressed.
On the other hand, how is it that ChessWorld places posters whose reply, as you say, may not be relevant? Should not they eliminate posters after certain period of time? Should not be that a perfect and sound “administration of bites”?
Come to think of it. . . then, what´s the sense of analyzing and correcting a past chess game, if it has already been played. . .?
|Wed Feb 25 2009 12:36PM | MsgID: 10941924|
I think it would be a good idea to inform new opponents (as they come in) that you, rather the game, might have “time inconveniencies” due to medical treatment.
It is not so much a mater of etiquette, as of fair play..
|Fri Jan 25 2008 1:22PM | MsgID: 8505702|
I hope I've posted this in the relevant section.
On reading a board message I've realised that I could be one of the offenders in taking a long time in games.
I apologise for this But I am attending hospital with a back disease on a regular basis which leaves me unable to play .
I understand the frustration that players face as I've experienced this myself on another site.
Again I apologise for taking so long and I will not take on any more games until I am able to give them adequate time.
Regards to all,