ChessWorld Glossary

ChessWorld Hitchhiker's Guide to Chess

Scope: This glossary does not intend to cover player names, opening names, or Composition terms. The Glossary aims to relate the terms to ChessWorld where possible when giving examples.
If you have contributions, corrections or questions, please post them to the Chess Forum for discussion.
There is a dedicated Chess Openings Glossary


Glossary Course Modules with Game Examples

Glossary Course Modules with Tactical Puzzle Examples

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | [O] | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z


O

Occupation
When pawns or pieces occupy squares, they physically are on those squares as opposed to controlling them from a distance. Because they are physically on those squares, they exert influence and pressure *from* those squares, as well as sometimes have blockading implications.

The Hypermodernists, (see Schools of Chess), would argue though that if one of the main benefits of occupation by pawns is square control, then perhaps square control can be achieved without making pawn structure commitments. Pawn structure commitments are made because of the fact that pawns unlike pieces cannot move backwards. Therefore if you move a pawn from d7-d5, and later need to protect the e5 square, the pawn cannot go backwards to d6.

If White plays 1.d4 White is occupying the d4 square with a pawn. If Black plays d5 black also is occupying a central square with a pawn. It should also be noted however, that Black is also physically blockading the further movement of White's pawn:-








Analyse position

From a hyper-modern school, (see Schools of Chess), perspective, it would seem more flexible for pawn structure to instead try and contest control of d5, and also exploit the relatively new weakness created by 1.d4. To this end, the Nimzo-Indian system which starts off with the move 1..Nf6 aims instead often to exert control on e4 and d5. So for example:-

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 b6 5. Nf3 Bb7







Analyse position

Black exerts a great deal of pressure on e4 and also d5. Black's d pawn has not yet been committed to d5. The Hypermoderns have often argued that control is more important than occupation. But if d5 was played, then White's pawn is also physically restrained and blockaded. Blockade is also a very important Nimzovichian hyper-modern concept, which can most simply be achieved by occupation. However, if the game does occur as follows:- 1.d4 d5

Then White can immediately challenge Black's occupation of d5 and therefore also attempt to lift the blockade of the d pawn, with: 2.c4








Analyse position

Which would add further weight to the argument that "occupation" is more committal than "control" because once a square is occupied by a pawn, there are further commitments needed to maintain it. This is more evident in the Queens Gambit than the King's Gambit.

The King's Gambit, which in principle would seem as strong as the Queens Gambit, is not as tactically sound because it potentially weakens White's king more, and also black can often hang on to the pawn with exf4 very comfortably. This might be why there is no equivalent of 1.d4 Nf6 for the 1.e4 opening - because 1..e5 is a perfectly good move as both 2.f4 and 2.d4 have particular issues. if 2.d4 then Black has exd4 followed by Nc6 gaining a tempo on White's queen.

The Hypermodernist Richard Reti would often avoid a committal 1st pawn move by instead playing 1.Nf3 and let Black occupy the center, so later Black would be subject to attack.

Classicalists might argue that occupation of the center with pawns also means that outpost squares are reinforced. For example, after 1.e4, there are potentially reinforced outpost squares on e5 and c5:-








Analyse position

Today, the most popular first moves remain as 1.d4 or 1.e4 with also the English opening with 1.c4 being very popular. Moves such as 1.b3, (The Bird's opening), or 1.g3, (Benko's system), are less popular.

However, the legacy of the Hypermoderns also remains popular today with, for example, the Nimzo-indian defence being one of the most popular ways to defend against 1.d4. Additionally 1...Nf6 is a very popular alternative to the classical 1...d5 when White plays 1.d4. 

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

Odds
A method of using a handicap in chess. Rook-odds means that one player removes a rook before the start of the game. Pawn-and-move odds means that one player removes a pawn and also takes the Black pieces, thereby allowing the opponent to move first. Example start position where White offers odds below:-








Analyse position

Games where "odds" were given were quite fashionable in the Romantic era of chess in the 19th century. 

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

Open file
A file which is not occupied by any pawns. The e file is an Open file in the diagram below:-








Analyse position

 

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

Open Game
Generally a game in which the center pawns have been exchanged off, or there are few pawns on the board but still a lot of pieces, are referred to as "Open" games. Certain variations use the "Open" qualification to imply pawn exchanges such as the "Open Sicilian":-

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4

As opposed to the "Closed Sicilian" which white plays 2.Nc3 and does not offer to trade pawns usually.

The term "Open Game" usually refers to 1.e4 and Black playing 1...e5 in return.

See also terms for Semi-open and Closed games. 

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

Opening
The first part of a game, up to point where play deviates from known patterns. 

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

Opposition
A relationship between enemy kings in the endgame.

See diagram below:-








Analyse position



If it is White to move here, the logical result would be a draw. If it is Black to move, then the logical result is a loss for Black. The Opposition is very important in Endgames especially where it is decisive which player's turn it is - because of Zugzwang.

Here is an excellent video by Jrobychess about opposition:

 

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

Outpost
A "hole" in the enemy position which can be occupied by a minor piece, or sometimes by a rook. A "hole" is a theoretical weakness in the opponent's pawn structure, in which a piece can occupy that hole because it is not guarded by the opponent's pawns.

A knight outpost on d5 can be particularly effective especially when the outpost is "unassailable". In the following example master game below, White creates an "unassailable" knight outpost on d5 by making use of a cunning pawn sacrifice. Once the Knight is firmly established on d5, White's attack almost plays itself.


[Click here to replay the game]
Boleslavsky vs. Lisitsen, 1956
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.Be3 Bg7 7.f3 O-O 8.Qd2 Nc6 9.O-O-O Nxd4 10.Bxd4 Qa5 11.Kb1 e5 12.Be3 Be6 13.a3 Rfd8 14.Nb5 Qa4 15.c4 Bxc4 16.Nc3 Qb3 17.Bxc4 Qxc4 18.Bg5 Qe6 19.Bxf6 Qxf6 20.Nd5 Qh4 21.Qe2 Bf8 22.Qf1 Rac8 23.g3 Qg5 24.h4 Qh6 25.g4 g5 26.hxg5 Qxg5 27.Rh5 Qg6 28.g5 h6 29.Rxh6 Qxg5 30.Rh5 1-0
 

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

Outside Passed Pawn
A passed pawn which is at some distance from the other pawns. It may be weak and a liability, or strong and possibly can be used as a decoy, depending on the position. In the example game below Schlechter's outside passed pawn forms a decisive advantage, especially when shepherded by White's king


[Click here to replay the game]
Schlecter vs. Mason, 1903
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Bd7 6. Be2 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8. f4 Nxd4 9. Qxd4 Bc6 10. b4 O-O 11. Bb2 Ne8 12. b5 Bd7 13. Nd5 f5 14. Bd3 c6 15. bxc6 bxc6 16. Nxe7+ Qxe7 17. Rae1 fxe4 18. Rxe4 Qf6 19. Qc4+ Qf7 20. Re7 Qxc4 21. Bxc4+ d5 22. Bxd5+ cxd5 23. Rxd7 Rc8 24. Rf2 Rc4 25. Rxd5 Rcxf4 26. Rxf4 Rxf4 27. Rd3 Kf8 28. Ba3+ Kf7 29. Rd7+ Kg6 30. Rxa7 Rc4 31. Re7 Nf6 32. Re2 Ra4 33. Bb2 Rxa2 34. Bxf6 Kxf6 35. Kf2 h5 36. Ke1 g5 37. Kd2 Kf5 38. Kd3 Ra8 39. c4 Rd8+ 40. Kc3 Rc8 41. Kb4 Rb8+ 42. Ka5 Rc8 43. Kb5 Rb8+ 44. Ka6 Rc8 45. Rc2 Ke5 46. Kb7 Rc5 47. Kb6 1-0
 

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

Overloading
Giving a piece more duties (usually in defence) than it can cope with.  

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

Overprotection
A Nimzovichian / Steinitzian strategy which involves putting a lot of pieces to focus on usually a central point or a "strong square". Often the preliminary to this strategy is to swap occupation of a central square with a pawn for control of that square instead. The concept may also exist in the "Art of War" which seemed to have a lot of Nimzovichian ideas expressed in more fundamental form.

Perhaps it could be argued that "Overprotection" similar in concept to simply using good opening principles of trying to make sure one's pieces are taking control of the center, and in particular for example the central four squares of the chessboard.

However one can always increase the intensity (after the Opening phase of a game) of such control of key squares - "strengthening" control, and perhaps the main implication of "Over-" protection is this notion of *strengthening* existing control still further as a security measure to ensure our position has minimal potential weaknesses.

If a square such as e5 is overprotected, it will often mean it would be difficult in practice for the opponent to even consider contesting it with say f6 because of the pent-up pressure of the pieces overprotecting it. For example exf6 would unleash massive e file pressure and diagonal pressure, etc. Therefore the over-protection has helped establish "authority" over a square and discouraged even the oppnonent trying to undermine control of that square because of the potentially explosive implications of piece pressure.

Pieces in touch with the center often have greater activity, and this is most evident in the case of the Knight. When a Knight is placed at the edge or corner of the board, it has a lot less squares of control than when placed in the center. Therefore it is good if knights "overprotect" the central four squares because it would usually imply the knights themselves are in fairly good positions.

The following game below shows first the doubling of White's pawns and then the Nimzovichian strategies of "Restraint" and "Blockade". Then later, there is some "overprotection" of the e4 square by black.
But it also combines overprotection with a later kingside attack. Indeed the e4 pawn is sacrificed to further the attack. But the black pieces were well placed by that stage.






[Click here to replay the game]
Johner,Paul F vs. Nimzowitsch,Aaron

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 O-O 5.Bd3 c5 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.O-O Bxc3 8.bxc3 d6 9.Nd2 b6 10.Nb3 e5 11.f4 e4 12.Be2 Qd7 13.h3 Ne7 14.Qe1 h5 15.Bd2 Qf5 16.Kh2 Qh7 17.a4 Nf5 18.g3 a5 19.Rg1 Nh6 20.Bf1 Bd7 21.Bc1 Rac8 22.d5 Kh8 23.Nd2 Rg8 24.Bg2 g5 25.Nf1 Rg7 26.Ra2 Nf5 27.Bh1 Rcg8 28.Qd1 gxf4 29.exf4 Bc8 30.Qb3 Ba6 31.Re2 Nh4 32.Re3 Bc8 33.Qc2 Bxh3 34.Bxe4 Bf5 35.Bxf5 Nxf5 36.Re2 h4 37.Rgg2 hxg3+ 38.Kg1 Qh3 39.Ne3 Nh4 40.Kf1 Re8 0-1



The following link shows an annotated game made up which made fun of Nimzovich

Funny annotated game exaggerating the power of overprotection

An intriguing question is whether or not Nimzovich was inspired by his predecessors in particular Steinitz who also apparently used the notion of "Overprotection" in his games, such as the example game below:



[Click here to replay the game]

Steinitz,William vs. Weiss,Miksa

1882, Vienna - Round 11, Vienna, ECO C00
1.e4 e6 2.e5 c5 3.f4 d5 4.exd6 Bxd6 5.g3 Bd7 6.Nf3 Bc6 7.Bg2 Nf6 8.O-O Nbd7 9.d3 O-O 10.Nbd2 Nb6 11.Qe2 Qc7 12.b3 Be7 13.Bb2 a5 14.a4 Nbd5 15.Nc4 Nb4 16.Rae1 Nfd5 17.Nfe5 Bf6 18.Qf2 Be8 19.g4 Rd8 20.g5 Be7 21.Ng4 Nc6 22.Qh4 Nd4 23.Be4 f5 24.gxf6 Nxf6 25.Nxf6+ Bxf6 26.Qxh7+ Kf7 27.Bg2 Rg8 28.Ne5+ Kf8 29.Rf2 b5 30.axb5 Bxb5 31.Bh3 Re8 32.Re4 Bc6 33.Rxd4 cxd4 34.Ba3+ Be7 35.Bxe6 1-0



Often in Overprotection examples as a preliminary, one side gives up "occupation" of the central squares for "Control" of the central squares.
In the above Steinitz game, White did this with the move 4.exd6. In many Nimzovichian examples, the Advance French defence is used to illustrate it with dxc5 being played.

Fischer's use of 'Overprotection' with the 2.d3 system against the French

In some Fischer games where he has used a seemingly quiet 2.d3 system against the French defence, he has later employed what is arguably an Overprotection of e5. Especially highlighted with manoevers such as Nd2-f1-e3-g4 or Nd2-f1-h2-g4. And the move move h4-h5, Bishop move Bf4, etc. By reinforcing the e5 square, Fischer was able to successfully attack opponents from this quiet variation against the French defence.  

 Find Relevant Videos | View Tip as Course Module

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | [O] | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z